Now live: Capital AI, your financial sparring partner
Use this benchmarking tool to compare your benchmarks against other companies from your peer group.
Click on "Get your benchmarks".
Insert your numbers to instantly see benchmarks like MRR growth, NDR, and runway,
Create an account to get access to all benchmarks.
Benchmarks without action are just numbers. re:cap lets you analyze, forecast, and fund – so you don't just keep up with peers, you pull ahead.
– Benchmark to make decisions, not dashboards. Track 8-12 SaaS metrics tied to your model, stage, and motion – ignore the rest.
– Cohort fit or it didn’t happen. Compare against peer-matched cohorts (ARR band, ACV, motion, region) or your conclusions will mislead you.
– Close the loop. Diagnose → hypothesize → run a sprint → re-measure. Benchmarks must change plans, priorities, or budgets – otherwise they’re trivia.
In this article you’ll learn: what SaaS benchmarking is (and isn’t), the core metrics that matter by stage, how to build peer cohorts, where benchmarks go wrong.
Benchmarks are a compass. They set direction, not coordinates. Used well, SaaS benchmarks calibrate investor conversations, prevent self-delusion (“compared to what?”), and help allocate capital efficiently.
Used poorly, they average away context and create vanity reporting. Focus your SaaS metrics benchmarks on the handful that explain growth, retention, and cash conversion.
Rule of 40: The Gold Standard for SaaS Efficiency
Optimize for the Rule of 40: growth rate + profit margin ≥ 40%. It balances speed with sustainability and becomes non-negotiable at scale. Treat it as a guardrail for planning, hiring, and go-to-market pace.
Burn Multiple Benchmark: Measuring Capital Efficiency
Burn multiple = net burn ÷ net new ARR. Healthy SaaS typically lands 1.0–1.5; <1.0 is elite. It helps answer, “How efficiently do we turn cash into recurring revenue?” Use it alongside CAC payback and gross margin for a full capital picture.
Net Revenue Retention (NRR) Benchmarks
Net revenue retention (NRR) tracks expansion, contraction, and churn within your base. 100–110% is healthy early; 110–120% is strong through growth; 120%+ is top-tier at scale. NRR is the heartbeat of SaaS performance metrics because it compounds.
SaaS Churn Benchmarks by ARR Stage
Logo churn varies by motion and ACV:Enterprise and mid-market: aim for <5% annual logo churn.SMB and PLG: higher logo churn may be normal—counter with strong net dollar retention from expansion.
CAC Payback Period Benchmarks
CAC payback measures time to recover acquisition costs from gross profit:Early: 18–24 months can be acceptable while proving model fit.Growth: 12–18 months is healthy.Scale: <12 months signals strong efficiency.
Track it by channel and segment; use it to throttle spend.
Context matters. Always cohort by ARR band, ACV, sales motion (PLG vs. sales-led), gross margin, and customer segment (SMB vs. mid-market vs. enterprise). That’s how you turn SaaS benchmarks into decisions.
Early Stage ($1–10M ARR) Benchmarks
– MRR growth rate / ARR growth: 80–120% typical when PMF is durable
– NRR: 100–110%
– CAC payback: 18–24 months
– Burn multiple: 1.0–2.0 (lower is better; guard against vanity hiring)
– Focus: Land PMF, instrument definitions, and prove repeatable acquisition
Growth Stage ($10–50M ARR) Benchmarks
– ARR growth: 40–80%NRR: 110–120%
– CAC payback: 12–18 months
– Rule of 40: 30–40
– Focus: GTM specialization, pricing & packaging, expansion motions, efficiency lift
Scale Stage ($50M+ ARR) Benchmarks
– ARR growth: 30–50%
– NRR: 120%+
– CAC payback: <12 months
– Rule of 40: 40+
– Focus: Operating leverage, segment P&Ls, durable unit economics
1) Build peer-matched cohorts (cohort fit > sample size).
Compare only to companies that match your ARR benchmarks band, ACV, motion, margin profile, and segment. A PLG $99/mo app should not borrow CAC benchmark targets from a $120k ACV enterprise suite.
2) Use time-bounded windows.
Benchmark on rolling 12 months or the last 2–4 quarters. Mixing 2021 anomaly growth with 2025 reality distorts targets for any tech company benchmarks set.
3) Make it actionable, not aesthetic.
Limit your SaaS KPIs to 8–12 metrics tied to your strategy. If a metric never changes the plan or budget, drop it.
4) Normalize definitions and sources.CAC: include paid, people, and tools.NRR: exclude FX noise; reconcile downgrades accurately.Gross margin: after infra + support.
Instrument ERP/finance, CRM, product analytics, billing, and your warehouse—avoid fragile spreadsheets.
5) Close the loop.
Create a benchmark-to-action cadence: diagnose → hypothesize → 4–6 week sprint → re-measure. Roll insights into quarterly plans and annual strategy.
Use them for: strategic planning, fundraising narratives, board updates, and stress-testing plans (“too aggressive or too conservative?”).
Ignore them when: you’re pre-PMF, your model is atypical (e.g., hardware-enabled SaaS, fintech with capital costs), or macro shocks make historical software metrics non-comparable.
– Averages hide strategy. Use peer-specific medians inside like-for-like cohorts.
– Point-in-time vanity. Report TTM and seasonally adjust.
– No linkage to planning. Every metric should map to a target, sprint, or reallocation.
– Metric overload. Enforce the 8–12 metric rule aligned to your growth thesis.
1. Clarify strategy → pick metrics. Are you optimizing for efficient growth (Rule of 40), dominance (share), or cash (runway)? Choose 2–3 metrics per pillar and write them down as SaaS KPIs.
2. Define peer cohorts. Split by ARR, ACV, motion, and market; commit to 3–5 cohorts for a year to keep targets stable.Instrument sources. Finance (ERP), revenue (CRM), product analytics, billing (PSP), and your warehouse.
3. Normalize definitions. Publish a one-pager so SaaS metrics benchmarks are apples-to-apples.Set targets with guardrails. e.g., “Hit 14–16 month CAC payback by Q2 without pushing NRR below 110%.”
4. Operationalize.
– Monthly: review benchmark deltas and assign sprints.
– Quarterly: reset targets and budgets.
– Annually: revisit cohorts and strategy.
SaaS benchmarks don’t run your company—you do. But the right B2B SaaS benchmarks remove guesswork, align teams, and convert cash into durable growth. Keep your cohort tight, your window fresh, and your loop closed.
1. What exactly is a “benchmark” in SaaS, and what isn’t?
A benchmark is a peer-based reference point for a metric (e.g., CAC payback, NRR) drawn from a cohort that matches your model, stage, and motion. It’s not a universal target, an average across mismatched businesses, or a vanity number to justify status quo.
2. How many metrics should we benchmark, and which ones?
Aim for 8–12. Pick the smallest set that explains growth, retention, and cash efficiency. Typical core set: ARR growth, NRR, logo churn, CAC payback, LTV/CAC, gross margin, burn multiple, Magic Number (sales efficiency), Rule of 40.
3. What are the formulas for the most referenced benchmarks?
– Burn Multiple = Net Burn ÷ Net New ARR
– CAC Payback (months) = CAC ÷ Monthly Gross Profit from the acquired cohort (or CAC ÷ (ARPU × Gross Margin × Retention-adjusted contribution))
– NRR = (Starting ARR + Expansions − Contractions − Churn) ÷ Starting ARRMagic Number = (Current-Quarter ARR Δ × 4) ÷ Prior-Quarter S&M Spend
– LTV/CAC = LTV ÷ CAC, with LTV ≈ (ARPU × Gross Margin) ÷ Churn Rate
– Rule of 40 = Growth % + Operating Margin %
4. What makes a “trustworthy” cohort for comparison?
Cohort fit > sample size. Match on:
– ARR band (e.g., $1–10M, $10–50M, $50M+)
– ACV (SMB vs. MM vs. Enterprise)
– GTM motion (PLG vs. sales-led vs. product-assisted)
– Margin profile (infra-heavy vs. pure software)
– Region/segment (pricing power & sales cycles vary)
5. Why time windows matter so much?
Use TTM (trailing 12 months) or last 2–4 quarters. 2021 anomaly data paired with 2025 market conditions will mis-set targets and either over-tighten or over-loosen budgets.
6. How do we operationalize a benchmark → action loop?
Diagnose gaps vs. cohort.
Hypothesize the few levers that move the metric.
Run a 4–6 week sprint (pricing test, onboarding fixes, quota/coverage change).
Re-measure and roll learnings into quarterly plans.
Tie every metric to an owner, a lever, and a timebox.
7. When is the Rule of 40 the right north star?
At $50M+ ARR, it becomes non-negotiable. Below that, it’s useful as a guardrail (avoid growth at any cost or profit without growth). If you’re early stage, growth + retention quality matter more than squeezing to 40 at the expense of PMF.
8. What’s a “good” burn multiple—and when is <1.0 realistic?
1.0–1.5 is generally healthy; <1.0 means adding ARR faster than you burn cash—most achievable in PLG motions or when expansion NRR is strong. Expect temporarily higher burn multiple during step-ups in GTM capacity (new regions/segments) but set a timeboxed return to target.
9. How should we interpret NRR by stage?
– $1–10M ARR: 100–110% (prove expansion motion)
– $10–50M: 110–120% (multi-product or usage expansion working)
– $50M+: 120%+ (strong land-and-expand + pricing power)
If logo churn is high in SMB, you can still achieve strong NRR through expansion and seat growth—but investor scrutiny on logo churn will rise.
10. What’s a realistic CAC payback target by stage?
Early ($1–10M): 18–24 months
Growth ($10–50M): 12–18 months
Scale ($50M+): <12 months
Track it by channel and segment. Turn down channels above threshold unless they supply strategic logos or pipeline flywheel effects.
11. How do we avoid “metric overload” while staying investor-ready?
Group everything into three pillars and cap each at 2–3 metrics:
– Growth: ARR growth, NRR, pipeline coverage
– Efficiency: CAC payback, Magic Number, burn multiple
– Durability: Gross margin, Rule of 40, logo churn
Use a single-page definitions doc to keep finance, GTM, and product aligned.
12. What data sources should feed our benchmarks?
– Finance/ERP (burn, margins)
– CRM (pipeline, win rate, sales cycles)
– Billing/PSP (ARR, MRR, expansions/downgrades)
– Product analytics (activation, engagement leading indicators)
– Data warehouse as the single source of truth
Avoid manual sheets for core metrics—breaks audit trails and undermines trust.
13. How do we normalize definitions across teams?
Publish a one-pager answering:
– What’s in CAC (paid, people, tools) and what isn’t
– Exact NRR/NDR treatment (FX, credits, step-downs)
– Gross margin inclusions (infra + support)
– ARR vs. MRR rules (multi-year, prepaids, ramp deals)
This turns debates into decisions.
14. What are common traps—and the fixes?
Averages hide strategy: Use peer-matched medians.
Point-in-time vanity: Report TTM and seasonality-adjusted views.
No link to planning: Tie each metric to targets, sprints, budget shifts.
Mixed cohorts: Separate PLG vs. sales-led, SMB vs. enterprise, and infra-heavy vs. pure software.
15. How do fundraising benchmarks differ from operating benchmarks?
Fundraising adds threshold checks (e.g., Series A $1–2M ARR; Series B $5–10M; runway 18–24 months). Operating benchmarks guide how you get there (NRR, CAC payback, burn multiple). Use fundraising thresholds to calibrate timing, not to dictate your whole operating model.
16. What’s a sensible “guardrails” example?
Reach 14–16 month CAC payback by Q2 without pushing NRR below 110% and while keeping gross margin ≥75%. This preserves growth quality while improving efficiency.
17. How do we handle outlier periods (e.g., one mega-deal or a churn spike)?
– Switch to TTM views to smooth noise.
– Provide segment drill-downs (by ACV, region, product).
– Annotate with event flags (pricing change, quota reset, product launch).
– Re-baseline targets only if the structural change persists for 2–3 quarters.
18. What’s the fastest path to better NRR?
Work the three levers:
– Onboarding to first value (shrinks early-life churn),
– Packaging & pricing (introduce expansion paths, usage tiers),
– Customer-led growth (adoption playbooks, champions, multi-team expansion).
Instrument cohort-level expansion curves so you can predict NRR from usage signals.
19. How should PLG companies read “enterprise” churn benchmarks (and vice versa)?
Don’t. Compare like with like. PLG/SMB will show higher logo churn but can exceed enterprise NRR via usage expansion and virality. Enterprise targets (e.g., <5% logo churn) are not portable to $99/mo products.
20. How do we decide whether to chase a benchmark gap now or later?
Score gaps on valuation impact and time-to-improve:
– High impact + short time = Do now (e.g., quota/coverage, pricing test).High impact + long time = Stage & staff (e.g., new product line).
– Low impact = Defer to reduce distraction and metric sprawl.
21. How can we use benchmarks in quarterly planning without sandbagging?
Set range-based targets (e.g., CAC payback 13–15 months).Pair each with a leading indicator (win rate, ACV uplift, activation).Lock 1–2 bets per quarter and reserve a flex bucket for high-ROI surprises.
22. What’s a quick diagnostic for “why is CAC payback slipping?”
Check in order:
– Win rate ↓ or sales cycle ↑?
– ACV/mix shifting down-market?
– Channel CAC inflation (paid search saturated)?
– Gross margin compression (infra/support creep)?
– Onboarding delays (gross profit realization pushed out)?
Fix the first broken link—not the whole chain.
23. Is “average” safe?
Not necessarily. Being at the median can be risky if your strategy requires a premium (category creation, crowded GTM). Benchmarks are the starting point; your strategy and narrative explain intentional divergences.
24. What’s a pragmatic weekly/monthly benchmarking cadence?
– Weekly: KPIs vs. plan (leading indicators, exceptions only).
– Monthly: TTM benchmark deltas, sprint outcomes, 1–2 course corrections.
– Quarterly: Reset targets, budgets; refresh cohort comparisons.
– Annually: Revisit strategy and cohort design.
25. How do we talk benchmarks with the board?
Lead with cohort-matched medians and your position vs. peers, then the actions in flight and the next sprint. Keep it to one page: metrics, gaps, levers, dates, owners.
.gif){kind=icon}
